3 ms·
But you're a tech person. I'm trying to think of this from the point of view of e.g. a likely potential jury. Again: Imagine two AI machines, different in one
by jrm4 2y ago
But you're a tech person. I'm trying to think of this from the point of view of e.g. a likely potential jury.
Again: Imagine two AI machines, different in one way: One of them has been fed "Article X" and the other hasn't.
You press buttons on the machine(s) in the same way.
The machine that was fed "Article X" spits out something that looks like Article X, and the one that wasn't, doesn't.
The magic inside, I don't think will much matter.
- GaggiX 2y ago>But you're a tech person. I'm trying to think of this from the point of view of e.g. a likely potential jury. Courts can call experts to testify on matters requiring specialized knowledge or expertise.
- jrm4 2y agoAbsolutely; but again, if I'm the lawyer on the other side, I'm pretty confident that I'm beating any "expert" on this with the simple logic of: - You put thing into the machine - You press buttons, it makes obvious derivative work - You don't put thing into the machine, and it can't do that anymore. There is "something" in there GENERATING COPIES and we see exactly where it came from, even if we can't identify it in the code or whatever.