If you get further down, they expand their view on Morality to be more nuanced, and something that sounds pretty reasonable. I think the core of their view is:

If you get further down, they expand their view on Morality to be more nuanced, and something that sounds pretty reasonable. I think the core of their view is: > My view is that morality is “real” in the same way that language is real. Both can change, but still operate within certain constraints. There are rules to every language, and rules to every morality. > Saying morality isn’t real is like saying language isn’t real. And saying there is one true morality is like saying there is only one true language. There's more to it than that, so it's worth reading that whole section if you want to give the author another chance.