4 ms·
That fact alone makes me wonder what the bigger story is. E.g.: Are the pros/cons considerations very close to a tie? Is this change a no-brainer, implying th
by CoastalCoder 2y ago
That fact alone makes me wonder what the bigger story is.
E.g.: Are the pros/cons considerations very close to a tie? Is this change a no-brainer, implying that something about the Java is really slow to improve the language?
- PaulHoule 2y agoThey're just very careful.
- kaba0 2y agoJava previously didn’t have pattern matching, and now re-uses an older syntax to have that. There is nothing “slow”, java was never meant to be at the forefront of language design (it’s a blue-collar language). Even then, it is not at all behind compared to the other mainstream languages with this feature - most of them don’t have pattern matching at all.