This is a positive ruling, but it seems to be a little ridiculous to be applying anti-circumvention claims to something as trivial as a website password. What

This is a positive ruling, but it seems to be a little ridiculous to be applying anti-circumvention claims to something as trivial as a website password. What I am more interested in is if a similar precedent would apply to fair-use of legitimately obtained content or hardware (e.g backing up a Blu-Ray disc, obtaining and installing a mod-chip in a video-game console to utilize third-party applications, etc.)