3 ms·
Its probsbly hard to reliably enforce it since hard to figure out if bulding is occupied or not. You can have someone registered at the residency but still not
by pzo 2y ago
Its probsbly hard to reliably enforce it since hard to figure out if bulding is occupied or not. You can have someone registered at the residency but still not live there.
You could maybe try to figure out based on water usage but then someone could just leave water tap slightly leaking since water cost is not that expensive
Probsbly squatters are those cheap solution that can enforce it in the most efficient way
- unaindz 2y agoYou don't need to know if people live there, just raise tax enough so that the owner feels like renting or selling the building is better than paying the taxes out of pocket.
- account42 2y agoThis also forcess poorer people (including retired people) to sell off the house they are actually living in. This is especially true if the tax is based on the current estimated value which may be much higher than what the house was bought for.
- terminalcommand 2y agoThere are ways around this. For example set a property tax from second home on. Do not tax the primary residence. Or set income brackets. If poorer people live in their own homes they don't pay property tax.
- dukeyukey 2y agoWhy does it matter if someone lives there or not? Slap a land value tax on it, high enough that if the owner doesn't make use of it they'll feel it.
- terminalcommand 2y agoYou do not have to care if it is occupied. Tax the property tax. If the owner does not rent out the property, they'll pay out of pocket.