3 ms·
It depends the time or place you are comparing (e.g., seventeenth century Britain was a more unequal place than modern day Britain). And in the Middle Ages, ev
by garciansmith 2y ago
It depends the time or place you are comparing (e.g., seventeenth century Britain was a more unequal place than modern day Britain).
And in the Middle Ages, even if you just look at Western Europe, wealth distribution could be extremely variable between places and times. A peasant in eighth century Lombardy would have been subjected to totally different customs and laws than one in twelfth century Brittany, same with other segments of society. There was nothing like a universal "feudal law" anywhere. Even the concept of the "church" being a single monolithic thing that received X% of wealth makes no sense (e.g., bishops could simultaneously be lay lords with vast holdings, a monastery could be rich or poor, etc.).
- zrn900 2y agoYes it varied but the main format still stood - the serfs had a sizable share of the economic value and the lords did not have 99% share like they do today. > Even the concept of the "church" being a single monolithic thing that received X% of wealth makes no sense Church's own domains and the share that the church receives from the crops of a feudal lord's domain are different.