3 ms·
> If CUDA wouldn't have been tied to NVIDIA hardware... Initially I thought that AMD didn't offer a CUDA reimplementation out of NIH-syndrome (as it would be a
by DaiPlusPlus 2y ago
> If CUDA wouldn't have been tied to NVIDIA hardware...
Initially I thought that AMD didn't offer a CUDA reimplementation out of NIH-syndrome (as it would be a marketing coup for NVIDIA), but then I saw that NVIDIA seem to be actively trying to shut-down independent attempts at running CUDA on non-NVIDIA hardware: https://www.techpowerup.com/319984/nvidia-cracks-down-on-cuda-translation-layers-changes-licensing-terms https://www.techpowerup.com/319984/nvidia-cracks-down-on-cud...
- jonathankoren 2y agoThey should lose. As I said in another comment, SCOTUS just ruled that APIs weren't copyrightable, and there's a HUGE parallel with Microsoft and Sun Microsystems over Java. In the end, Sun settled for Microsoft to stop saying "Java compatible" and $20 million. The community on the other hand got OpenJDK four years later. Just do it. Fuck the lawyers. When you win, you toss some cash and they'll ya for it. https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/sun-microsoft-settle-java-suit/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/sun-microsoft-settle...