3 ms·
> you are saying is the people prefer someone who is apparently appears not have a dark side. IMO such people are just adept at camouflaging their dark side, po
by diputsmonro 2y ago
> you are saying is the people prefer someone who is apparently appears not have a dark side. IMO such people are just adept at camouflaging their dark side, politicians do it routinely.
When this person owns one of the largest communication platforms on Earth and regularly spreads conspiracy theories, disinformation, and transphobia... yes, I would prefer they hide that. That rhetoric does real harm to people.
Accusing someone of being a pedophile without evidence isn't something you just say "Well at least he's speaking his mind!" to.
The richest man on Earth should be able to afford a therapist, or at least a PR firm. If his ego is preventing him from doing so, well, that's a fair thing to criticize.
- jay-barronville 2y ago[flagged]
- mavhc 2y ago[flagged]
- jay-barronville 2y ago[flagged]
- dennis_jeeves2 2y ago>regularly spreads conspiracy theories, disinformation, and transphobia What you are saying indirectly are that common people are idiots to believe those 'conspiracy theories' ? or am I misinterpreting you? >Accusing someone of being a pedophile without evidence isn't something you just say "Well at least he's speaking his mind!" to. No I did not quite mean that. No excuses for him to call someone names. But if you know people ( or along lines of what I understand of people), actions speak louder than words. The most evil people manage to hide their evilness though glib talk.