4 ms·
And incredibly, it’s not some buggy mess. They’re real, they work, and they provide utility. They’re not perfect, but it’s not some horrible battleground of ro
by vineyardmike 2y ago
And incredibly, it’s not some buggy mess. They’re real, they work, and they provide utility.
They’re not perfect, but it’s not some horrible battleground of robotic bumper cars and dead bicyclists.
- Lammy 2y agoThey work fine but are a privacy nightmare for occupants and the public alike: https://support.google.com/waymo/answer/9190819?hl=en https://support.google.com/waymo/answer/9190819?hl=en InB4 “akshully you have no right to privacy in public” — you should, and those laws predate ubiquitous cameras in every pocket, on every doorbell, and rolling down every street.
- jessriedel 2y agoI think this is a reasonable concern, but it any/much different than Uber or Lyft?
- Aurornis 2y agoWhat’s the privacy nightmare? That the cars have cameras? Do you also think it’s a privacy nightmare when you step into an elevator with cameras? Walk into a building with cameras? > InB4 “akshully you have no right to privacy in public” — you should, and those laws predate ubiquitous cameras in every pocket, on every doorbell, and rolling down every street. Surveillance cameras have been ubiquitous for a decade and the laws have been updated in many countries around that fact. Cameras in public spaces are not a new invention. If you’re trying to suggest that we should ban cameras in public spaces then you’re never going to be happy with reality.
- 93po 2y agoExcept for when a dozen of them all fail in the same intersection, and the endless videos of them nearly hitting pedestrians