3 ms·
Don't worry, I'm pretty sure someone will find your comment useful -------- Thanks for the feedback: 1. You're right, the UX can use some improvements there 2
by samixg 2y ago
Don't worry, I'm pretty sure someone will find your comment useful
--------
Thanks for the feedback:
1. You're right, the UX can use some improvements there
2. I've just updated the landing page with a before/after example
3. Ooh, that's not good, thanks for reporting this, I'll look into it asap
- thomasfromcdnjs 2y agoI'm also working on a similar feature, it's simple but complicated too "merge" information in when using GPT's. I imagine you've encountered it too. If I say I have an array of interests ['music', 'gardening', 'racing'], and a GPT replies ['music', 'gardening', 'racing', 'competitive driving'], you don't want additive synonyms. And then more complicated is deletions, if it replies, ['gardening', 'racing', 'skydiving'], does that mean I want to remove 'music' or did it just forget to include it in the response so should I just merge the old and new array. I'm probably going to open source a llm-structured-data-merge-thingy library (that has different merge strategies) in the near future.
- samixg 2y agoYeah, it's pretty complicated. I didn't really solve it, but I'd be interested to see how you do it.