I agree that the locks shouldn’t be allowed. At the minimum, it should be false advertising to describe exchanging money for a DRM-infected product as a “sale”.

I agree that the locks shouldn’t be allowed. At the minimum, it should be false advertising to describe exchanging money for a DRM-infected product as a “sale”. That said, I’ve watched an endless parade of unbreakable encryption being broken. I don’t expect that to change any time soon.