4 ms·
I upvoted you before you added the second paragraph because I thought your joke was funny. "But your equivocation between silencing other viewpoints and elimin
by grourk 14y ago
I upvoted you before you added the second paragraph because I thought your joke was funny. "But your equivocation between silencing other viewpoints and eliminating unhealthy voices is not useful." Why not? I was making the point that it's often not easy to tell the difference.
- jamesaguilar 14y agoI mean, the body of the blog post you're responding to is claiming a) that it is, and b) that even when it isn't, you can just leave a poorly modded community. In the face of that, I don't find "replace-the-word" rhetoric very compelling.
- stcredzero 14y agoWhat are the factors that would make it compelling?
- jamesaguilar 14y agoIf it were shown that even in good communities with solid mods, a primary use of moderating power was to silence dissent. For example, in this community, anti-startup articles get posted occasionally. I'd expect to see far more dead comments from people who post agreement with such articles. But I browse with showdead on, and I see no such thing. Basically, the rhetoric needs to line up with the evidence at hand. If it doesn't, it's unsound.
- stcredzero 14y agoSpeaking of moderating power, it appears I've been down-modded for asking a clarifying question out of genuine curiosity.
- jamesaguilar 14y ago'twasn't me. That being said, whoever downmodded you probably felt it should be obvious.
- stcredzero 14y agoIt was more obvious, re-reading the parent post and noting the phrase, "In the face of that." My reading of your comment without absorbing the phrase's implications prompted the question.
- wissler 14y agoI can't believe you upvoted him at all, he wasn't joking he was mocking you while failing to comprehend the connection you were making. Given the subject matter here, I find that very ironic indeed.