This was my first thought as well. But thinking about it more, we are not saying that all information has to be true or that someone can't be wrong. I think i

This was my first thought as well. But thinking about it more, we are not saying that all information has to be true or that someone can't be wrong. I think it is also easier to identify obviously false information than it is to identify true just due to the nature of discovering things. It is easier to rule out than identify. That also helps combat the "censorship" claims. So it seems like it would be seeing a pattern of false information. Maybe they do legitimately believe what they are saying because they fell down some rabbit hole. But if a majority of subject matter experts would say something is false and that happens over and over again for someone, than they are likely not contributing much to the platform.