4 ms·
I think if you read the guide that dang linked to, it is clear that the account is breaking the rules for flamebait.
by sir0010010 2y ago
I think if you read the guide that dang linked to, it is clear that the account is breaking the rules for flamebait.
- oddtuple 2y agoI have read the guide, although i appreciate reaffirming it as the source of truth. What’s hard is from a glance at the posters history their comments don’t seem to break the guidelines, but instead fall into the camp of spirited (albeit strongly so) opinions. Are there specific comments made that weren’t in the spirit of the guidelines? It feels “primarily for ideological purposes” is hard to counter in a discussion because “ideological” itself is a murky term at best.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- burnished 2y agoThe point is the pattern (I think the person you are responding to is incorrect about flamebait), you'd go look at the topic of their most recent comments - if the vast majority of interactions are to argue X then that seems to fall under 'idealogical battle'.