3 ms·
I haven’t read the paper yet but I want to share my immediate thought. So the harder it is to “convince” the LLM on a wrong answer, that’s a proxy for low epis
by maCDzP 2y ago
I haven’t read the paper yet but I want to share my immediate thought.
So the harder it is to “convince” the LLM on a wrong answer, that’s a proxy for low epistemic uncertainty?
I know you shouldn’t view the LLM as a “mind” - but I can’t help myself!
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y agoThe more interpretability research I read the more I am convinced it is a mind. Not like our own, but more similar than most users realize. The deeper we look more parallels to organic brains emerge.