2 ms·
Why not? See Gutmann, Peter: "A Cost Analysis of Windows Content Protection": http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html http://www.cs.auckland
by mechanical_fish 18y ago
Why not? See Gutmann, Peter: "A Cost Analysis of Windows Content Protection":
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
Windows Vista includes an extensive reworking of core OS elements in order to provide content protection for so-called “premium content”, typically HD data from Blu-Ray and HD-DVD sources. Providing this protection incurs considerable costs in terms of system performance, system stability, technical support overhead, and hardware and software cost. These issues affect not only users of Vista but the entire PC industry, since the effects of the protection measures extend to cover all hardware and software that will ever come into contact with Vista...
Even before Vista was released, this guy predicted that third-party hardware would exhibit persistent stability problems with Vista. And, lo, the reports from the field just keep coming in, even years later. (Though presumably the bugs have gradually been worked out by this point.)
(Note that I can't report any bad Vista experiences myself; I have not used it.)
- mattmaroon 18y agoI hope you're kidding. Reports from the field about bugs in every operating system come in for years. I've heard nothing about systemic graphics card driver problems. I don't think it's fair to take a report from someone with a clear anti-drm agenda and assume from it that Vista is what's causing some else's ATI Catalyst driver to malfunction.