5 ms·
This just smacks of big dumb companies trying to "automate away" HR and not really paying attention to the consequences. And, candidates not figuring out HR sys
by tristan_juricek 14y ago
This just smacks of big dumb companies trying to "automate away" HR and not really paying attention to the consequences. And, candidates not figuring out HR systems.
What I fear, however, is that this isn't really a problem for the executives for a public company. Their real compensation these days is all tied to stock prices; I don't see the incentive to really care about HR. How does adding people change the stock price? (Usually I only hear about it from the other way; cutting jobs to cut costs.)
Have you ever heard of investor pressure to hire candidates?
- TDL 14y agoIt becomes an issue when there are too many vacancies and revenues begin to fall. Most c-level executives don't have their comp tied to stock prices, but to revenue growth (which is as bad as having it tied stock prices.) That being said, this definitely a heavy case of big & dumb.
- sokoloff 14y agoEvery C-level exec with share-based (RSU or option) compensation quite clearly has their comp tied to share prices. I doubt very many C-level execs at public companies have no share-based comp.