Why the anger? It created controversy, as any political donation can. That's a fact, and one of the things he's most known for by the average person - not a cri

Why the anger? It created controversy, as any political donation can. That's a fact, and one of the things he's most known for by the average person - not a criticism of him. Further, even if it was a criticism, it's not somehow wrong by definition to criticise somebody for a donation, since you can donate to anybody. People can be immoral - political leaders and advertisers included. If the body he donated too was overtly engaged in behavior one finds immoral, one may reasonably criticize him for it. One may also reasonably disagree with the determination of immorality. But you should do that - disagree - rather than pretend there's no given reason for a criticism.