3 ms·
Do I understand correctly that a low swappiness basically also means higher priority of anon pages over disk caching, simply because the former uses more space
by blauditore 2y ago
Do I understand correctly that a low swappiness basically also means higher priority of anon pages over disk caching, simply because the former uses more space and the latter "runs out" eventually?
I.e. low swappiness would achieve what you want, sort of?