3 ms·
Awful site, calling a donation to one of the two US parties "controversial" just because they don't like it.
by bun_terminator 2y ago
Awful site, calling a donation to one of the two US parties "controversial" just because they don't like it.
- thejohnconway 2y agoWhat do you think “controversial” means? Because it seems to be the correct usage to me.
- leptons 2y agoHe hid political donations, that's what's controversial. He probably should be investigated, because his political donations are to "the party of law and order" which is turning out to be "the party of lawlessness and disorder".
- happytoexplain 2y agoWhy the anger? It created controversy, as any political donation can. That's a fact, and one of the things he's most known for by the average person - not a criticism of him. Further, even if it was a criticism, it's not somehow wrong by definition to criticise somebody for a donation, since you can donate to anybody. People can be immoral - political leaders and advertisers included. If the body he donated too was overtly engaged in behavior one finds immoral, one may reasonably criticize him for it. One may also reasonably disagree with the determination of immorality. But you should do that - disagree - rather than pretend there's no given reason for a criticism.