>mathematically justify and therefore imagine logically. Isn't statistics a lot more of a down-to-earth branch with "theoretically" some of the most well-under

>mathematically justify and therefore imagine logically. Isn't statistics a lot more of a down-to-earth branch with "theoretically" some of the most well-understood certainty determination? I'm no expert but my odds are on having it hugely more probable for imagination to be illogical in some way, rather than logical through-and-through. Equations can be confusing, what people really want is to draw a valid conclusion; >one that fits what we know about the math right now. What are the odds that right this minute there is actually anyone at all smarter than there ever was in the past? Making it very likely that this is not the highest point in math or very many other things either. Then again, that could be just my imagination ;)