Social media desperately needs a non-advertising and non-subscription business model. Relying on a billionaire to subsidize losses out of the goodness of his h

Social media desperately needs a non-advertising and non-subscription business model. Relying on a billionaire to subsidize losses out of the goodness of his heart because he believes in the importance of a free and open virtual public square is not a sustainable business model. Nor is relying on advertisers who demand ever more intrusive ads and ever more censorship of opinions they dislike. Nor is relying on subscriptions because a platform that excludes people who don't pay isn't useful. So maybe it is a public good that needs to be run by either the government or a charity that rich people fund to get out of paying taxes? Regardless, a neutral social media platform where people can speak to the general public and say what they believe without any favoritism on the part of the platform towards any viewpoint is as essential for maintaining democracy in the 21st century as the free press was in the 18th and 19th centuries and as the Fairness Doctrine for television and radio was in the 20th century. Society has to find a way to make that happen in a manner that can be sustained permanently.