3 ms·
> It's not more cruel than introverts forcing extroverts into not socializing. Well that's the point: Society has made it acceptible for extroverts to force in
by Longhanks 2y ago
> It's not more cruel than introverts forcing extroverts into not socializing.
Well that's the point: Society has made it acceptible for extroverts to force introverts into socialising, but the other way round is somehow inacceptible.
> Having fun at work is no more a right than not having fun at work is a right.
Having or not having fun is no right in itself anyway. Companies that force introverts into situations they are uncomfortable with are eventually going to lose them. The extrovert's fun stops where it is actively harming the introverts. Undermining introverts' feelings by making them feel uncomfortable in order to have fun is harassment.
- paulcole 2y ago> Companies that force introverts into situations they are uncomfortable with are eventually going to lose them. There's nothing inherently wrong with this. Just like there's nothing wrong with extroverts quitting a job that doesn't provide them with what they want and makes them feel uncomfortable. The business may be less successful after the introverts quit or they may be more successful after the introverts quit. It's the company's risk/decision. > The extrovert's fun stops where it is actively harming the introverts Not liking something and being harmed by it are 2 different things that are sometimes related. That's a very important distinction to make. Neither the introvert nor the extrovert need to love everything about their job. They may hate some aspects of it! They may choose to stick it out or quit. Both are fine.