Right. I look at this like a Bayesian Chance of someone - seeing it before: 10% - being a liar: 5% - being the next Claude Shannon: 0.000001% So someone co

Right. I look at this like a Bayesian Chance of someone - seeing it before: 10% - being a liar: 5% - being the next Claude Shannon: 0.000001% So someone coming up with the right answer and claiming they've seen it is useless. Right answer and claiming they hadn't seen it is basically a guaranteed liar. You can use it to filter out the liars I guess. But you'll also filter out your Claude Shannons as well. Either way, it's a dumb test unless you're genuinely getting a steady stream of Princeton and Cambridge magna cum laudes waltzing through the door and can reliable bump the last two priors by a few decimal points.