4 ms·
The issue is the opposite. Chinese has a comparitively small phonetic pallette (depending on how you view tones). Chinese written completely phoenetically can e
by pringk02 2y ago
The issue is the opposite. Chinese has a comparitively small phonetic pallette (depending on how you view tones). Chinese written completely phoenetically can easily become incomprehensible.
https://ninchanese.com/blog/2022/05/09/the-lion-eating-poet-the-meowsome-one-sound-poem-you-can-only-read/ https://ninchanese.com/blog/2022/05/09/the-lion-eating-poet-...
- mmaniac 2y agoThe functional load of tones (that is, the importance of a pronunciation difference for distinguishing words) in Chinese is comparable to that of vowels[1] "Depending on how you view tones" dismisses the important phonemic value of tones. Writing Chinese completely phonetically includes writing the tones. [1]https://faculty.washington.edu/levow/papers/fltonemandarin.pdf https://faculty.washington.edu/levow/papers/fltonemandarin.p...
- emblaegh 2y agoI find hard to believe every language in the planet can be successfully expressed using some sort of alphabetic system, except for Japanese/Chinese (and local variants)
- DiogenesKynikos 2y agoThey could be written alphabetically, of course. The question is just what you lose, given that the characters are a massive part of Chinese and Japanese culture. Chinese has evolved alongside its writing system for about 3000 years, and switching over to pinyin (the standard Latin transliteration) would be a complete revolution in Chinese culture.
- emblaegh 2y agoI was responding to the assertion that writing Chinese using an alphabet would render the text incomprehensible, not arguing that China or Japan should switch over.
- sajforbes 2y agoCurious to know how you think it's possible that Chinese people are able to speak with each other if you think writing their language phonetically would render it incomprehensible.