4 ms·
It's much easier to work with LISP. It's functional, trees are easy to reason about. We're using an even more simplified language in this work. It's kind of lik
by revalo 2y ago
It's much easier to work with LISP. It's functional, trees are easy to reason about. We're using an even more simplified language in this work. It's kind of like the MNIST for progsynth research. Scaling this to real and useful programming languages and domains is still non-trivial, and is a major drawback of our work here.
- jmugan 2y agoThanks for your response. I think I would even rather it be a limited subset of Python. But I seem to be in the minority here. Cool work!