Rationalization, meet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_rationality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_rationality In short, confounding. The vehicle

Rationalization, meet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_rationality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounded_rationality In short, confounding. The vehicle is the least important thing to him [now, probably], yet this quirky little contract is a needless thorn. Why should he endure all of the erosion you open with? The paper agreement? Holding someone to a technicality encourages being beat on one. It harms good faith. I don't know, feels like we're doing too much. The sale should be finished, and at most, continue between him and the bank (I haven't bothered to learn his specifics) on his terms. I don't like the redefinition of ownership. Tesla feels parasitic with this, seeming to wash it with the fear of scalpers. I feel for him/others. This policy serves Tesla, as fanfare if nothing else, more than him or you/I. It's a toy/commodity - nobody needs these.