3 ms·
I agree. As a metaphysical ponderer, I often consider how "illusion" is fundamental to our understanding of science. Consider this: all physical laws and theori
by nightowl_games 2y ago
I agree. As a metaphysical ponderer, I often consider how "illusion" is fundamental to our understanding of science. Consider this: all physical laws and theories are verified through human experience on a time scale, ie: under these conditions, you will observe this result. There is always an observer and at least two points in time. Time, and observation of it, is the ground truth of all physical laws, of our very experience of the universe.
- wordpad 2y agoYou can also prove things by deriving it mathematically, without need for any observation. Some things can even be counter intuitive like relativity and quantum physics.
- nightowl_games 2y agoEven in your mathematical derivations, there is an implied observer and time line. Ie: "Using these axioms, performing these operations, you will observe this result". (Precondition, action, result)
- keefle 2y agoValid point, but then I wouldn't consider classical mathematics to be a science