4 ms·
> And so, yea, guys aren't sexually active. The social, medical, and economic risks are too high for all people involved. I don't really see how you equate bei
by wkat4242 2y ago
> And so, yea, guys aren't sexually active. The social, medical, and economic risks are too high for all people involved.
I don't really see how you equate being sexually active with reproduction though. In this day and age they are very different things. And many men and also many women (though I believe less, they often have an urge to have them) simply don't want kids. Doesn't mean that they can't have a relationship or a healthy sex life.
- shagie 2y agoUp four comments in the chain we're replying and you get: > Well, birth rates are below replacement rates in most western countries where pornography is consumed more than elsewhere. Also, more people are single, more men are not sexually active, high divorce rates, etc. The implication is that porn is hindering the replacement rate of a population. This gets into various other dog whistles (if you poke at dead comments you'll find even more overt ones). https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ICSR-Report-Sleeping-with-the-Enemy-Sex-Sexuality-and-Antisemitism-in-the-Extreme-Right.pdf https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ICSR-Report-Sle... (page 22 is where the section on pornography begins) (the publisher of the document is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Centre_for_the_Study_of_Radicalisation_and_Political_Violence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Centre_for_the_S... )