Certain Italian super-car creators really don't like aftermarket stuff. One of the two larger entities - if not both - will similarly blacklist. That seems fin

Certain Italian super-car creators really don't like aftermarket stuff. One of the two larger entities - if not both - will similarly blacklist. That seems fine. There's generally no lasting commitment between buyer/seller. The seller can be mad, paid, and free of claim/more annoyance. The buyer can enjoy what they bought and carry on elsewhere. It can make servicing/replacement parts needlessly difficult, but fine. Now, the blocking of the resale, I have trouble with that. It sounds like a lease with fewer steps. If I'm paying purchase money, I want purchase benefits. Autonomy. Heh. Not to dismiss leases: they allow for people to enjoy something nice for smaller/regular payments. Freeing up the larger chunk is valuable. The point is kind of fuzzy: one shouldn't be able to 'sell'/transfer their rights. This is like selling part of yourself. Where this meets practicality? Selling things carries the rights with it. I feel like choosing my belongings/who gets them/under what terms are all part of those. If I don't own it, be honest. It's a financial imposition after the sale is done, 'simple' as that. It can be argued. It shouldn't have to be IMO. Edit: Grandstanding now on my soap box - scalpers are the boogeyman to create a cartel Who's to say I didn't just give it to someone else for really, really bad terms? There may be implications RE: buyer selection/taxes. I'd consider it worthwhile to spite the former owners, Tesla.