5 ms·
The article mentions fact.check.org, however, it looks like the correct site is factcheck.org.
by guruparan18 14y ago
The article mentions fact.check.org, however, it looks like the correct site is factcheck.org.
- martythemaniak 14y agoArticle also fails to mention that using something like factcheck.org will typically get you branded a liberal.
- nextstep 14y agoReality has a well-known liberal bias.
- javajones 14y agoWell according to TV viewing habits conservatives tip the scales for reality. http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/related_news/2011_Dec_07_republican-democrat-likes-dislikes http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/related_new...
- gnaritas 14y agoLiberal isn't a dirty word, it's not something you're branded with.
- HazzyPls 14y agoIt is in some circles.
- gnaritas 14y agoNot intelligent ones.
- eropple 14y agoIn a large (but shrinking, year by year) part of the country, it most definitely is. Those aren't places most people want to go, though.
- eropple 14y agoIn a large (but shrinking, year by year) part of the country, it most definitely is. Those aren't places most people want to go, though.
- potatolicious 14y agoNeither is "socialist" but that isn't stopping anyone...
- javajones 14y agoAccording to who?
- jlgreco 14y agoIt is to the sort of people who might perform such branding.
- msh 14y agoIn denmark liberale are considered to be right wing...
- joelhooks 14y agoAt some point in the early 20th century they flipped it over here. A "rebrand" of sorts.
- roel_v 14y agoThat's not what he meant - he meant (I think) that a US liberal is still considered right wing in Denmark, i.e. that the Danish 'liberals' are US 'pinko commies' and US right-wingers are in Denmark either 'capitalist oppressors' or 'crazy religious extremist', or both, depending on context.
- vq 14y agoThis is true for Sweden as well.