4 ms·
That’s exactly what I was going for — the issue of transparency here. It wasn’t dissecting why he’s “bad”, it’s that the public statements don’t match up with f
by iamthirsty 2y ago
That’s exactly what I was going for — the issue of transparency here. It wasn’t dissecting why he’s “bad”, it’s that the public statements don’t match up with financial realities.
Maybe next time I could press more about the transparency factor, but I thought it was concise enough.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> public statements don’t match up with financial realities Has he ever plead poverty?
- iamthirsty 2y agoObviously not, but as I state in the article he has plead: > “He owns no stake in the ChatGPT developer, saying he doesn’t want the seductions of wealth to corrupt the safe development of artificial intelligence, and makes a yearly salary of just $65,000.” According to OpenAI themselves. So he takes a “low” salary and no ownership as to, according to him and the company, not influence his decisions in the pursuit of financial gain — yet that’s a complete omission of the whole truth. I’ll stop short of calling it a flat-out lie, but a mischaracterization of reality for sure.
- piva00 2y ago> I’ll stop short of calling it a flat-out lie, but a mischaracterization of reality for sure. In my opinion a mischaracterisation of reality is just a lie with layers of indirection to weasel oneself out of it. It's definitely a lie.