4 ms·
"The deepest man-made hole, which extends 12,262 meters below the surface of Siberia, took nearly 20 years to drill. As the shaft went deeper, progress declined
by auspiv 2y ago
"The deepest man-made hole, which extends 12,262 meters below the surface of Siberia, took nearly 20 years to drill. As the shaft went deeper, progress declined to less than a meter per hour—a rate that finally decreased to zero as the work was abandoned in 1992. That attempt and similar projects have made it clear that conventional drills are no match for the high temperatures and pressures deep in the Earth’s crust."
This is true. Neither the article nor the CEO of the microwave drill company say why.
At that depth, rock isn't a solid. It behaves plastically. The traditional tri-cone bit used could make progress, but it kind of just started "massaging" the rock. The bit (as all bits do) wore out. They pulled the drill string out of the hole to put a new bit on. The borehole would close back in during the multiple days it took to pull 40kft of drill string out, change the bit, and put it back in. Progress was not possible.
Unless the microwave drill includes some enormous cooling system (that works 40kft down hole even when the drillstring is removed!), they will face the same issues.
Also, separately, I saw pictures of the resulting lab-drilled hole on LinkedIn the other day. The hole shows a high rugosity (qualitative description of the roughness of a borehole wall). Similar photo here - https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/image-of-a-rock-surface-with-a-melted-hole-in-the-middle-that-appears-to-extend-deep-into-the-rock-surface.jpg https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/image-of-a-rock-surf.... That's a ugly hole, and would be very difficult to run casing into it.
Further - traditional well drillers' #1 focus is controlling pressure downhole (typically done by varying the density of the drilling mud). If the pressure becomes too great, a blowout can happen, which is bad news for everyone involved (see the BP Deepwater Horizon incident). For geothermal wells, they presumably will try to avoid hydrocarbons. However, rock far above water boiling point can cause a BLEVE (boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion), which is also undesirable. Super curious to see how they intend to control bottomhole pressure with statements like this - "Instead of pumping fluid and turning a drill, we’ll be burning and vaporizing rock and extracting gas, which is much easier to pump than mud."
- Terr_ 2y ago> At that depth, rock isn't a solid. It behaves plastically. Sometimes this false-intuition comes out in sci-fi settings, when some terrible force scars a planet or moon with a big gash/puncture/fragmentation which appears semi-permanent, rather than being (relatively) quickly erased as the thing--a liquid on that scale--reflows back into a spheroid.
- audunw 2y agoFrom what I understand the whole point of the solution is that you don’t have to remove their equivalent of a drill string while drilling the whole. It can all be done in one continuous operation. That’s why it’s so much faster. I’m not sure they would need cooling down there? They’re continuously blasting gas down inside the waveguide, and the gas can only escape on the outside around the waveguide. Maybe it’ll be like blowing air down a straw into honey. I don’t know the temperature of the gas they’re pumping down, but maybe it’s colder than the rock at deeper depths which will help keep the rock around the waveguide cool expect for at the tip where the rock is being blasted. Do they need a casing? I seem to remember reading somewhere that the process of blasting the rock will harden the walls of the hole. Though I’m curious how that would work at extreme depths.
- greenthrow 2y agoIn the article they state the idea is the beam source would stay on the surface.
- gridspy 2y agoFascinating! What would you consider the water source for a BLEVE? There is no drilling liquid, so are you concerned about drilling near a water source and the well becomes suddenly contaminated with water, then steam?
- cladopa 2y agoLike most new technologies, I bet they will not get the goal they are aiming for, but when they try they could get other interesting results as valuable as the original goals. If you get a technology capable of creating cheap holes, you will be capable of getting lots of cheap natural gas and hydrogen reservoirs.