Oh okay, so these are two different academic projects. > If the research team from Stanford University is proven to have plagiarized this MiniCPM-V project fro

Oh okay, so these are two different academic projects. > If the research team from Stanford University is proven to have plagiarized this MiniCPM-V project from Tsinghua University, they should feel ashamed, and also, MiniCPM-V project deserve an apology and acknowledgment. I was thinking this might have been a commercial organization stealing from an open source project or something. > This is the strongest evidence that llama3-V does not train its model at all, but adds random Gaussian noise to the model parameters of miniCPM-llama3-v2.5 And not just "built on without attribution", but a literal copy between the products with minimal changes.