3 ms·
That's very cool. Thanks. At first I thought they were just press-fit pins (see https://www.te.com/content/dam/te-com/documents/automotive/global/whitepaper-pr
by buescher 2y ago
That's very cool. Thanks. At first I thought they were just press-fit pins (see https://www.te.com/content/dam/te-com/documents/automotive/global/whitepaper-pressfit-072014.pdf https://www.te.com/content/dam/te-com/documents/automotive/g...) but they are not!
More here:
https://www.we-online.com/components/media/o210254v410%20ANE011b_EN.pdf https://www.we-online.com/components/media/o210254v410%20ANE...
Very nice alternative to Tag-connects. It looks like the PCB footprint is a little larger per pin but the connector is less fragile and the connection would be more robust. Great for having a debugger or logger attached during lifecycle testing especially in the prence of vibration. I also find their other suggested use - enabling expansion connections with no added cost to the base unit - very intriguing. "Options" are very typically higher margin than base products so having a way to enable adding them that does not add a connector to every unit has a lot of potential use cases.