3 ms·
That child's doctors personally examined the child, have expertise to deal with the situation, and are aware of any details which are important. A HN commenter
by jsprinkles 14y ago
That child's doctors personally examined the child, have expertise to deal with the situation, and are aware of any details which are important. A HN commenter has not personally met either party, in most cases is not a lawyer so he does not have expertise to deal with the situation, and most importantly, are only aware of what one party has told them. There is a significant difference.
- detst 14y agoYou should take a look at an exchange between that guy and a guy with the bio: "Software development, web design ; interested in movies, animation and humor." [1] Should they both just shut up and let the big boys handle it? Or should he take another person's input and use his head to determine it's value? People are capable of offering valuable input without expertise and full details. As PG said, "Don't trust stuff you read on forums." He didn't say ignore it. It might even save his son's life. I'm strongly inclined to believe this can work in law as it can work with extremely rare medical conditions. [1] http://twitter.com/mattmight/status/207529584999153664 http://twitter.com/mattmight/status/207529584999153664