3 ms·
Your reply reads like you completely ignored the previous comment, because it basically answers all questions/addresses points you posed in this one.
by lostmsu 2y ago
Your reply reads like you completely ignored the previous comment, because it basically answers all questions/addresses points you posed in this one.
- eviks 2y agoYour analogy is wrong in both characterizing the problem and offering a solution: 1. The majority doesn't want this just because they fail to protect their data properly 2. Defaults matter and having an option doesn't imply perfect awareness/disabling by that non-majority group So at most you've somewhat reduced the affected group while still not addressing the original issue why you think it's ok to ignore the non-majority (It also doesn't address the video calls) So no, your comment answered none of my points
- lostmsu 2y ago1 basically contradicts the whole premise from 6 or so levels above that for majority this does not present any additional risks to their data, because they never delete it anyway. 2 addressed above "ignoring" non-majirity addressed in Ctrl+C comment.
- eviks 2y ago1. was about a different flaw in your argument, not 6 above. That one is also wrong, see X levels above re video calls which you don't need to explicitly delete for them to disappear from malware's view without Recall 2 addresses above, including Ctrl+C, so you need something new to address it
- lostmsu 2y agoThere are a number of things that do disappear. But when you put them in the line next to bank credentials, private pictures, passwords, and private documents, they pale in comparison. Re: awareness. Are you saying the only MS problem is they are not marketing capabilities enough? Assuming the video calls point is addressed, your whole "feature is extremely bad" argument is that it is on by default, and one has to know to do something to turn it off if they don't want it?