3 ms·
One thing that seems missing to me is that while the probe might send 160 bits/sec of useful data, those bits are not sent directly as such[1]: The TMU encodes
by magicalhippo 2y ago
One thing that seems missing to me is that while the probe might send 160 bits/sec of useful data, those bits are not sent directly as such[1]:
The TMU encodes the high rate data stream with a convolutional code having constraint length of 7 and a symbol rate equal to twice the bit rate (k=7, r=1/2).
So the effective symbol rate is 320 baud[2], and thus a factor of two should be included in the calculations from what I can gather.
Note that the error correction was changed after Jupiter to use Reed-Solomon[3] (255,223) to lower the effective bit error rate, so effectively I guess the data rate is more like 140 bps.
[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20130215195832/http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/Descanso4--Voyager_new.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130215195832/http://descanso.j...
[2]: https://destevez.net/2021/09/decoding-voyager-1/ https://destevez.net/2021/09/decoding-voyager-1/
[3]: https://destevez.net/2021/12/voyager-1-and-reed-solomon/ https://destevez.net/2021/12/voyager-1-and-reed-solomon/
- ooterness 2y agoFor the "photons per bit" question, the useful throughput of 140 bps is the only thing that matters. For the "how many photons are needed" question, I agree that 320 baud (i.e., the effective analog bandwidth of 320 Hz) should have been used for the Shannon-Hartley calculations.