4 ms·
You can look at the Geekbench 6 component. https://www.geekbench.com/doc/geekbench6-benchmark-internals.pdf https://www.geekbench.com/doc/geekbench6-benchmark-
by phonon 2y ago
You can look at the Geekbench 6 component.
https://www.geekbench.com/doc/geekbench6-benchmark-internals.pdf https://www.geekbench.com/doc/geekbench6-benchmark-internals... (page 18)
- KingOfCoders 2y agoThanks, Clang looks good, now I need to check how to sort CPUs/systems by the Clang benchmark, no success for now. "Randomly" picking 14900K 215.3 Klines/sec 7950x 230.3 Klines/sec M2 Ultra 233.9 Klines/sec M3 Max 196.5 Klines/sec
- aurareturn 2y agoSingle thread: M3 Max: 3898 7950x: 2951 The ST advantage of Apple Silicon is real. 7950x does do better in highly parallel tasks. To me, Apple Silicon is clearly leading clients over AMD/Intel. Hence, my original reason for why AMD's announcement isn't "exciting". Because Apple Silicon is so far ahead in client. Of course, AMD can crank up the core via Epyc/Threadripper and Apple has no answer. For that, you'd need to look into ARM chips from Ampere/Amazon for a competitor.
- KingOfCoders 2y agoYes, and is great if you are a gamer / have software that doesn't multi-core.
- hajile 2y agoOr if you don't want to blow out the power bill. A 7950x system at IDLE uses 50% more power than an M3 Max going all-out on a CPU workload. https://www.guru3d.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-review/page-7/ https://www.guru3d.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-review/page-...
- KingOfCoders 2y agoYes, if you have very expensive power, then this is a consideration.