> Python OOP != Rust OOP, but you naturally already knew that. No. Bold of you to assume that. I wasn't aware that one OOP isn't another OOP. I see, so OOP is

> Python OOP != Rust OOP, but you naturally already knew that. No. Bold of you to assume that. I wasn't aware that one OOP isn't another OOP. I see, so OOP is a fuzzyish definition that you check more checkboxes to satisfy. If Rust is OOP, and Python is OOP and C is OOP, then the that circles back to my initial claims. A category that is so wide it's effectively useless. Compare this to sync and async. A precise definition, much greater informational content. You can prove something is pure or not[1]. Compare this to OOP, imprecise, less informational context, impossible to (dis)prove something is OOP or not. [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43XaZEn2aLc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43XaZEn2aLc