3 ms·
Probably just because they're all very large, and very odd-looking mostly. Other types are generally smaller and more boring. They might also have been discov
by shiroiushi 2y ago
Probably just because they're all very large, and very odd-looking mostly. Other types are generally smaller and more boring. They might also have been discovered earlier, establishing those general body types.
Brontosaurus doesn't exist any more; apparently it was some kind of mistake due to incomplete knowledge I think, or maybe some kind of mix-up. Apatosaurus I think is the current king of that type of long-necked huge plant-eating sauropod.
- lostlogin 2y ago> Brontosaurus doesn't exist any more Really? I can’t see anything about this in the wiki? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brontosaurus https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brontosaurus
- shiroiushi 2y agoFrom your link: >Brontosaurus is a genus in the subfamily Apatosaurinae, which includes only it and Apatosaurus, which are distinguished by their firm builds and thick necks. Although Apatosaurinae was named in 1929, the group was not used validly until an extensive 2015 paper, which found Brontosaurus to be valid. However, the status of Brontosaurus is still uncertain, with some paleontologists still considering it a synonym of Apatosaurus. And: >Almost all 20th-century paleontologists agreed with Riggs that all Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus species should be classified in a single genus. According to the rules of the ICZN, which governs the scientific names of animals, the name Apatosaurus, having been published first, had priority; Brontosaurus was considered a junior synonym and was therefore discarded from formal use.