4 ms·
i think that the story is loaded with about 80% superfluous context and 20% story. op worked at us airforce base managing access control to global intel system
by aguacaterojo 2y ago
i think that the story is loaded with about 80% superfluous context and 20% story.
op worked at us airforce base managing access control to global intel systems. he delegated authorisation check to jr. jr told op they checked out, however, jr had not adhered to latest security protocol that required cross checking request against request database, relying instead only on physical credentials. op granted access however asked that an officer watch the civilians’ access directly.
a week later it turns out the civilians were conducting pen testing for the systems and op had to debrief how they gained access.
- fsckboy 2y agoand he doesn't sound humbled
- AndrewKemendo 2y agoNothing more humbling than 1000 people being shown your error But hey, if that didn’t come through, at least it was an exposition problem ;)