3 ms·
No matter the effort put into explaining the ineffectiveness of these stand-up meetings, the core issue remains: they serve as a platform for middle managers to
by tamimio 2y ago
No matter the effort put into explaining the ineffectiveness of these stand-up meetings, the core issue remains: they serve as a platform for middle managers to assert the authority they have long pursued. Rationalizing with this mindset proves difficult, and in the absence of these meetings, the roles of these managers -whom I refer to as ‘wranglers’- would be called into question. As a certified project manager myself, I can assert that the enforcement of these methodologies contradicts the principles of project management. Moreover, attempts to convey this perspective, especially from a certified individual to those who are typically not certified, often fall on deaf ears. Regardless of whether the approach is Agile or not, middle managers tend to transform these processes into the very shit show that is currently observed.
.
- lloydatkinson 2y agoAgreed - maybe that transformation has something to do with that cringe phrase “digital transformation” that agilists seem to say in every company update meeting.
- beryilma 2y agoPot calling the kettle black. I haven't seen many useful PMs either, other than being glorified note takers and document pushers. It is not the middle managers transforming these processes to shit show; the processes themselves are shit shows in the first place. Even their names Agile/Scrum are cringe-worthy.