3 ms·
> past that fps is sort of meaningless as the response time is slower than the refresh rate and you get artifacts. Not quite accurate since OLED panels do just
by Drew_ 2y ago
> past that fps is sort of meaningless as the response time is slower than the refresh rate and you get artifacts.
Not quite accurate since OLED panels do just fine driving >240 Hz refresh rates. There are already 360 Hz OLED panels on the market.
- Mathnerd314 2y agoWhat I meant is that fps by itself, without other information, is meaningless for judging panels. Like if someone says they got a 500hz panel, it is not necessarily better than a 240hz - LCD vs. OLED for example. But if you are comparing panels from the same manufacturer, same tech etc. then of course it is relevant. And obviously if you have a panel it would be stupid to run it at anything less than max fps, if your system can keep up.