> Can someone please explain how this is tolerated? Why is the guy not a laughing stock but a rector? Some good answers already in the comments and I just want

> Can someone please explain how this is tolerated? Why is the guy not a laughing stock but a rector? Some good answers already in the comments and I just want to point out that we need to stop lending so much credence to authority and titles and better recognize that it is perfectly possible to both hold a “prestigious,” even elected title like Rector or priest or President or judge or District Attorney and be a laughing stock at the same time