24 ms·
Is the footage fast-forwarded? I'd imagine landing to be much slower. Also, is that how the moon looks, or is this some kind of night vision?
by m_a_g 2y ago
Is the footage fast-forwarded? I'd imagine landing to be much slower.
Also, is that how the moon looks, or is this some kind of night vision?
- fernandopj 2y agoDefinitely. You can see the lander "breaking" to adjust fall trajectory twice, the actual burst wouldn't be that fast.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- beefnugs 2y agocamera footage taken in space is something weird indeed. I remember when i first saw how an eclipse affects shadows in real life. It immediately clicked in my brain why that early moon landing footage looked how it did. And also how easily so many people thought it was fake
- guerrilla 2y agoCan you elaborate?
- luyu_wu 2y agoShadows become incredibly sharp for instance, causing everything to look like it's rasterized in software!
- Toutouxc 2y agoIt looks exactly like on the first Apollo photographs. Guess they must’ve hired Kubrick's students. Jokes aside, there’s just one light source on the moon, and no atmosphere to provide diffuse light. The dynamic range (contrast) of the moon is something we don’t see often on Earth.
- qingcharles 2y agoAnd the lighting makes it really hard for the camera to see any stars, so the sky always looks deep black and fake which also adds to all those frustrating conspiracy theories.