3 ms·
This is the same kind of thing people always say, that a machine can’t replace a doctor’s bedside manner or a pilot’s intuition. Here is a clip from the first I
by EGreg 2y ago
This is the same kind of thing people always say, that a machine can’t replace a doctor’s bedside manner or a pilot’s intuition. Here is a clip from the first Iron Man, watch the first 15 seconds, word for word same kind of sentiment:
https://youtu.be/ZygApeuBZdk?si=6rRDvAncOoiO4cEo https://youtu.be/ZygApeuBZdk?si=6rRDvAncOoiO4cEo
And then technology proceeds to trounce humans and it turns out that people dont want London Cabbies to have “The Knowledge”, they’re totally happy with an Uber driver to mindlessly follow the GPS routing system which knows far more about traffic. And then a self driving car which never has any social issues and can regale you with anything you want during the drive, stay silent or play you any movie. Did you ask your parents for most subjects or ask google? People overestimate how much their special idiosynchrasies are needed by other people. They just want to get in, get out, and get what they want.
This was a year ago:
https://nypost.com/2024/03/26/lifestyle/im-a-model-whos-so-hot-that-people-accuse-me-of-being-ai-its-complete-insanity/ https://nypost.com/2024/03/26/lifestyle/im-a-model-whos-so-h...
https://medium.com/@blinx/combating-the-proliferation-of-social-media-fake-accounts-with-ai-technology-7f8bb9ece43a https://medium.com/@blinx/combating-the-proliferation-of-soc...
https://futurism.com/ai-generated-influencers https://futurism.com/ai-generated-influencers
And if you add partially AI-produced content, such as automatic clips translations b-roll and edits etc. it becomes even more content that’s AI produced.
People expect that increasing level of production value, and soon they will treat human influencers the same way they treat, say, a picasso painting vs DALL-E. The Picasso painting is just there, it can’t crank out what you want every minute. So it is a curiosity. But not where you get most of your news or whatever.
All the qualities you mentioned can be replaced by a superstimulus and most people will come to prefer it the same way birds prefer rounder fake eggs to their own eggs, and even kick their own eggs out.
As for where they will get the content? Where does news on twitter and telegram appear from? Crowdsourced news from everyone having a cellphone and then everyone discussing what they just uploaded. Citizen journalism. Just summarize a freaking forum and you have a podcast in all languages recorded in whatever voice and hottest anchors you want. And they can then also tell you anything you want to know in the “would you like to know more?” fashion of Starship Stormtroopers, if it had been a thing LOL. And sell you far better because they can give you individual attention and remember preferences of millions of people and your friends. And solve the two-sigma problem for educating students. Results will matter for parents. This next generation will grow up with AI friends and tutors, and will not want human tutors — for most subjects ! Let’s hope this next generation will still want human friends.
- keiferski 2y agoYeah I think you’ve veered into sci-fi story territory here and far from a realistic vision of the future. Which is really the issue with all of these absurd AI predictions. Here’s what I think is more likely: phone and camera manufacturers implement a way to track if a photo is taken from a camera in real life or not. Social media platforms do the same thing. AI content continues to exist but is not implicitly trusted, similar to the way we perceive photos today (but didn’t 50 years ago), in that they can be Photoshopped. Life continues on mostly as normal.
- ben_w 2y ago> Yeah I think you’ve veered into sci-fi story territory here and far from a realistic vision of the future. Which is really the issue with all of these absurd AI predictions. Much as I would agree that quoting a Marvel film is not a useful thing… the same quote exists for real-world examples like playing Go, or the game of Diplomacy. > Life continues on mostly as normal. The one single thing I'm confident of, is that "normal" will mean something completely different. I have only the vaguest beliefs about what that difference might look like, but the status quo absolutely isn't stable. Even the mere existence of the web upon which social media runs, is a thing which I lived through, a thing where I remember the before times; a time with film stars sure, but no online influencers. It wasn't a magic time without issues (there were, and remain, many problems with everything), but today would be considered a wild sci-fi fantasy compared to when I left secondary school, what with us all carrying GPS trackers because they were too cheap to not include in the phones we use to make too-cheap-to-meter video calls, which we use to share clips of cats being silly or how nice our lunch seems. There was no single moment in my life where I thought "this changes everything", but all those small changes added up and we don't live in the 1990s (or 80s) any more. The home computer went from a Commodore 64 playing Jet Set Willy to a Performa 5200 playing Marathon 2 and giving me a dial-up modem, but the games were still just games and the 56k modem struggled with everything and only connected at 8-10 kbit/s; I went to university and got a direct ethernet connection to the UK academic backbone and VOIP reached the consumer market but I had nobody to call; I eventually got a mobile, first a Nokia 6210 then some random colour screen feature phone then a Nexus 5 etc., but none of the individual transitions or upgrades really felt worthwhile, they were forced by the hardware breaking, and yet my iPhone SE 3 is clearly more capable and can enable things that were simply not possible on the 6210.