3 ms·
We shouldn't count on that though.
by RedShift1 2y ago
We shouldn't count on that though.
- vaylian 2y agoand the court of justice typically takes a looooong time to come to a conclusion
- knallfrosch 2y agoPlus the court can simply be ignored when it comes to data protection. See: - Safe Harbour - Privacy Shield - Data Privacy Framework
- MyFedora 2y agoIn case you didn't know, the court retroactively voided these agreements. EU-US data transfers have been illegal for around 25 years or so thanks to that. People can sue you and win, even though the data protection authorities don't do much.
- effie 2y agoWait, so the data transfers still happen, disrespecting the court decision?
- h4ckerle 2y agoYes. The court voided privacy shield in a ruling known as Schrems-II. The commission then created the Data Privacy Framework which is esentially the same as privacy shield against the will of the parliament, re-enabling transatlantic data transfer.
- knallfrosch 2y agoI don't understand. Can I get my data back? Can I retroactively avoid surveillance by US intelligence services? Has the data transfer stopped? If the answer is "no" eact time, then please explain how the court ruling impacts me.