3 ms·
Nope. The defence strongly objected multiple times and sought a mistrial over Daniels' testimony; Judge Merchan ultimately allowed most of it over their object
by MikeOfAu 2y ago
Nope.
The defence strongly objected multiple times and sought a mistrial over Daniels' testimony; Judge Merchan ultimately allowed most of it over their objections, setting up a likely issue for appeal by Trump's team.
- dave4420 2y agoThe defence attempted to engineer grounds for appeal. We will see whether they were successful in that. Trump’s legal defence MO is to delay everything for as long as possible and hope it goes away. They have certainly done enough to convince Trump’s supporters, but that was a low bar to clear.
- SR2Z 2y agoThe defense is attempting to get a mistrial because Donald Trump is so obviously guilty of this crime that no sane court could find otherwise. Much like when he lost the election, his preferred strategy is to pretend the rules shouldn't apply to him.