3 ms·
"it is OK for them to have bizarre sexual likes and dislikes." I agree, so long as they are not consuming something that harmed anyone. Just as we know banning
by Sporktacular 2y ago
"it is OK for them to have bizarre sexual likes and dislikes."
I agree, so long as they are not consuming something that harmed anyone. Just as we know banning ivory sales reduces elephant poaching, contributing to demand causes harm. Putting an AI step in between the CP and its consumption is the same as before, it doesn't change anything.
- roenxi 2y agoIt changes everything. It removes the part where harm needs to be done to satisfy demand. If someone says "I want a picture of X!" and an AI generates them the picture, no harm is done.
- Sporktacular 2y agoThe harm was done. It was just done before the consumption step, just like buying an ivory shoehorn or making a photocopy of an existing image of child abuse. The only way around it is the model is not trained on any child abuse material, otherwise legally it's consuming a CP product.